Leaderboard

I must admit I don't average the readings. Walk away and back again numerous times. From that there is one set of coords that appear more than others surrounded by a few that are .001 out. Then there are some that are different by 3 or 4 thousands. Those need to be ignored. To me a simple average brings in one's that are obviously incorrect. I would not have this feature as a priority. There are others that are far more useful eggs Status update, delete a cache from all offline lists

Agreed Nick. Every time I use it in Geosphere, the initial reading is what becomes the final reading. Not sure why. Maybe some other way to store multiple readings based on several days visited or even just walk 50 feet away and back again and add a new sample.

Currently, I believe every cache shows at least a waypoint count of 1. This is the original coordinate. This seems redundant and makes me look to see what the waypoint is. Consider showing an empty count when only WP is original coord. If corrected coords are done, then show original coord to allow going back easily. Count could be two then.

Good idea. Will look into fixing this.