novostromo 0 Report post Posted May 21, 2017 I am importing from dropbox and it seems to work, but I cant see any waypoints on the map Under "Offline" my import shows up but zero waypoints, attached screenshot from GPX file. What is the next smart move?, by the way the gpx file works when uploaded to Google Earth Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nic Hubbard 650 Report post Posted May 21, 2017 Does this GPX only contain Waypoints and no caches? If so, Cachly doesn't support this since all Waypoints need to be associated with a cache. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rragan 200 Report post Posted May 21, 2017 Speaking of which, it looks like deleting an offline cache leaves the waypoints in the DB. Reimport the cache and they magically reappear. Or are they on the web and just not visible? Seems like they should not survive deleting the parent cache from the DB. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nic Hubbard 650 Report post Posted May 22, 2017 3 hours ago, rragan said: Speaking of which, it looks like deleting an offline cache leaves the waypoints in the DB. Reimport the cache and they magically reappear. Or are they on the web and just not visible? Seems like they should not survive deleting the parent cache from the DB. Will look into this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nic Hubbard 650 Report post Posted May 22, 2017 3 hours ago, rragan said: Or are they on the web and just not visible? They are saved to geocaching.com but are not visible on the website. I just tested this and looked at the DB directly and the waypoints are being deleted when their parent cache is deleted. However, if you find a circumstance where it does not seem like this happens please let me know. Thanks! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brudderman 12 Report post Posted May 30, 2017 On 5/21/2017 at 10:09 AM, Nic Hubbard said: Does this GPX only contain Waypoints and no caches? If so, Cachly doesn't support this since all Waypoints need to be associated with a cache. Though certainly not a "must have" caching need, it would be mighty handy to be able to import waypoints into an offline list. For example: I have a GPX file of cemeteries in my state, and many times I'd like to see which ones are near the caches I'll be visiting. Similarly, I also have a GPX file of waterfalls and like to see if any of them are in the vicinity. Maybe feature to consider "one day." James 1 Nic Hubbard reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rragan 200 Report post Posted May 31, 2017 Could waypoints with no associated Cache, be stored as locations? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nic Hubbard 650 Report post Posted May 31, 2017 4 hours ago, rragan said: Could waypoints with no associated Cache, be stored as locations? Excellent idea. Yes, this would be possible. Will add this to the list. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brudderman 12 Report post Posted December 28, 2019 (edited) Was this feature ever added? If so, how do I access it? Right now I'm substituting (with an external program) waypoint coordinates (for historical schools, cemeteries, etc.) into a a basic GPX template (for offline caches) and importing the resulting file so that the waypoints then show as caches in an offline list. A bit tedious, but it works well, and I can simultaneously select and display the school list along with a list of caches to see what's nearby. It's also easy to highlight them if necessary to separate one type from the other (see attachment). Would sure be nice to have a way to import a file (GPX, CSV, TXT, etc.) directly into Cachly so the waypoints show up in a list. A feature in version 6 perhaps? Thanks! Edited December 28, 2019 by brudderman Added screenshot Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nic Hubbard 650 Report post Posted January 6, 2020 On 12/28/2019 at 11:48 AM, brudderman said: Was this feature ever added? No, this isn't something that was ever added. It is unfortunately far down on the priority list as there are many other features on that list that users would use more often. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brudderman 12 Report post Posted January 7, 2020 I agree with the low priority in favor of items of greater usefulness to more people. But if it had been added, I wanted to tap into it! Thanks! 1 Nic Hubbard reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites