Jump to content

Bolling

Members
  • Posts

    422
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    36

Posts posted by Bolling

  1. 15 hours ago, forest-ghost said:

     

    I find this label confusing. It would be nice maybe to have a note or something detailing that the backup is only for .gpx files. Or did I miss that? 
     

    It should probably read something like “Offline Lists Backups”. 

  2. 9 hours ago, forest-ghost said:

    Yes I was able to see the topo contours for Jeff city. I guess the map for St. Louis doesn’t have as much shading. All the big parks in my area are devoid of topo lines. 

    That’s possible. The original source of topo data must not be detailed in that area, especially if the hill were manmade. 

  3. I’m not the developer either. I do know however the change was not made for profits but for revenue. Running the offline map servers and paying for cloud storage is expensive. The developer either need to have the offline maps pay for themselves or he would likely chose to shut Cachly down. Then you would have no new offline maps either. 

  4. On 12/15/2020 at 2:11 PM, geocat said:

    GPX is the only accepted file format for import, isn't it? 

    Importing ggz and db3 files generated by GSAK would be a nice feature :)

    Just curios why you want to import a .ggz.  Isn't it just a .gpx in a specific format for Garmin?

    As for importing the database itself, I can't see how that would ever be worth Nic's time to develop.  There would be so much to a database that's not imported.  

  5. On 6/3/2019 at 4:44 PM, Vasco Galvao said:

    It would be a really nice tweak... please considere this ideia... It would speed up all my offline lists. I have more than 500k logs for 5000 geocaches, it’s a lot!!

    In the meantime, if you are a Windows user, you could use GSAK to do this.  Export your lists at GPX files and open them in GSAK.  Purge the logs and re-import.  Of course if you use multiple highlight colors you would lose that if you deleted your lists before import.

  6. On 7/24/2018 at 6:05 PM, rragan said:

    The only sad thing is that after the DNF threshold is reached, no one will go there to make the crucial "needs maintenance" to kick the CO and awaken the reviewer to start the days until archived counter. 

    Some thought is needed though regarding just DNF counts. A group of 3 may not find it on the same day. Should n DNFs on a single day count as 1? I tend to think so. I guess if Needs Maint is the status, DNF icon would not show. Does 1 find override a string of previous DNFs. I think it has to. 

    Locally I use GSAK to do this. I'm a pain.

×
×
  • Create New...